Saint Thomas and the Three Orders of the Medieval Imaginary. An exploration of inequality among men in his social and political philosophy
An exploration of inequality among men in his social and political philosophy
Palabras clave:
Tomás de Aquino, ´Desigualdad social, Trifuncionalidad política, Trifuncionalidad social, Participación política, Thomas Aquinas, Social Inequality, Political and Social Trifunctionality, Political ParticipationResumen
This paper examines inequality among men from a social and political perspective, in which the concept of ‘trifunctionality’ emerges as a key concept. The reflection presented here constitutes a continuation of a fundamental first part (published in issue 27 (2025), pp. 38-64, of this same journal), which dealt with the anthropological-metaphysical and theological doctrine of inequality among men according to Saint Thomas. This reflection now focuses on the Thomistic formulation of trifunctionality from both a social and political perspective. Returning to the conclusion of the first part, it is reaffirmed here that inequalities among men are not primarily natural, but rather moral. Now, in addressing this issue, while the existence of social and political inequalities is revealed, in Thomas’ view, these are fundamentally structural, not the result of individual moral merit. Furthermore, the free nature of the formation of society, based on consensus, highlights the possibility of an ever-increasing closeness among people, a consequence of that awareness of fundamental equality among them brought about by social friendship. Such progress, inherent to the dynamism of optimal social development, of a civilizing kind, can never occur outside the framework of hierarchical structures and functions that necessarily imply inequality among men.
Citas
Argüello, S. (2024). La condición natural y originaria del dominium entre los hombres.
Tomás de Aquino entre Agustín de Hipona y el neorrepublicanismo, Acta Philosophica,
(1), 49-67.
https://www.actaphilosophica.it/article/view/4549
Argüello, S. (2025). Thomas Aquinas’ anthropological-metaphysical and theological
understanding of inequality among men, Revista Chilena de Estudios Medievales, 27, 38-
Argüello S. & Destéfanis, J. (2024). Acerca de la concepción de la sociedad en Tomás de
Aquino y los modelos jurídico-penales escolásticos, Ius Canonicum, 64 (128), 661-705.
https://doi.org/10.15581/016.128.001
Beer, S. (1986). The Rule of the Wise and the Holy: Hierarchy in the Thomistic System,
Political Theory, 14 (3), 391-422.
Blythe, J.M. (1986). The Mixed Constitution and the Distinction between Regal and Political
Power in the Work of Thomas Aquinas, Journal of the History of Ideas, 47 (4), 547-565.
Casadesús, R. (2013). La estratificación social como la fuerza principal del cambio social,
Ars Brevis: anuario de la Càtedra Ramon Llull Blanquerna, 19, 56-67.
Catto, J. (1976). Ideas and Experience in the Political Thought of Aquinas, Past & Present,
, 3-21.
Chenu, M.-D. (1969). L’éveil de la conscience dans la civilisation médiévale. Institut
d’études medievales – Librairie J. Vrin.
Duby, G. (1978). Les trois ordres ou l’imaginaire du féodalisme. Gallimard.
Finnis, J. (1998). Aquinas. Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Hankey, W. (1997). Dionysian Hierarchy in Thomas Aquinas: Tradition and Transformation.
In Y. de Andia (Ed.), Denys l’Aréopagite et sa postérité en Orient et en Occident. Actes
du Colloque International Paris, 21-24 septembre 1994 (pp. 405-438). Institut d’Études
Augustiniennes.
Hanson, J. (2024). Thomas Aquinas and the Qualification of Monastic Labor. Religions, 15
(366), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030366
Harris, J. (2021). Collective Action and Social Ontology in Thomas Aquinas, Journal of
Social Ontology, 7 (1), 119–141.
Healy, M.E. (1972). Society and Social Change in the Writings of St. Thomas, Ward, Sumner,
and Cooley. Greenwood Press.
International Theological Commission. (2014). Sensus fidei in the Life of the Church;
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_cti_201406
_sensus-fidei_en.html
King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/
(Original work published 1769).
Luscombe, D.E. (1988). Thomas Aquinas and Conception of Hierarchy in the Thirteenth
Century. In A. Zimmermann & C. Kopp (eds.), Thomas von Aquin. Werk und Wirkung im
Licht neuerer Forschungen (pp. 261-277). Walter de Gruyter.
Luscombe, D.E. (2003). Hierarchy. In A.S. McGrade (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to
Medieval Philosophy (pp. 60-72). Cambridge University Press.
Maritain, J. (1944). The Rights of Man and Natural Law. Geoffrey Bles: The Centenary Press.
McCormick, W. (2022). The Christian Structure of Politics. On the De Regno of Thomas
Aquinas. The Catholic University of America Press.
McIlwain, Ch.H. (1932). The Growth of Political Thought in the West. Macmillan.
Murphy, M. (1997). Consent, Custom and the Common Good in Aquinas’s Account of
Political Authority, Review of Politics, 59 (2), 323-350.
Perpere, Á. (2014). Proyecciones de la ‘ley de la jerarquía’ al pensamiento social. De
Dionisio Areopagita a Santo Tomás de Aquino. En L. Corso, M.J. Soto-Bruna y M.I.
Zorroza (eds.), Ley y razón práctica en el pensamiento medieval y renacentista (pp. 365-
. Eunsa.
Porter, J. (2025). Nature, Equality, and Social Order in Aquinas’ Thought. In A.M. González
(ed.), Aquinas, Natural Law, and Social Ontology. Historical and Contemprary
Perspectives (pp. 183-197). Routledge.
Schwartz, D. (2023). Subjection and Freedom among the Angels. Angelic Prelacy in Early
Franciscan and Dominican Theology, Vivarium, 61 (1), 1-25.
https://brill.com/view/journals/viv/61/1/article-p1_1.xml
Thomas Aquinas. (1970). Liber contra impugnantes Dei cultum et religionem [Contra
impugnantes]. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia, t. 41A, Iussu Leonis XIII P. M.
edita, cura et studio fratrum praedicatorum.
Thomas Aquinas. (1971). Sententia libri politicorum [Super Pol.], In Sancti Thomae de
Aquino Opera Omnia, t. 48, vol. A, Iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, cura et studio fratrum
praedicatorum. Commissio Leonina.
Thomas Aquinas. (2028). Commentary on Politics [Manuscript in preparation], in
Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated from the Leonine
edition by F. Fast and edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volume 54;
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (1979). On Kingship to the King of Cyprus (transl. by G.B. Phelan (under
the title On the Governance of Rulers), revised with introduction and notes by I.T.
Eschmann). Hyperion (reprint of the 1949 edition published by the Pontifical Institute of
Mediaeval Studies).
Thomas de Aquino. (1979). De regno ad regem Cypri [De regno], en Sancti Thomae de
Aquino Opera Omnia, t. 42 (pp. 447-471). In Iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, cura et studio
fratrum praedicatorum, Editori di San Tommaso.
Thomas Aquinas. (2018). Summa Theologiae [S. th.], in Latin/English Edition of the Works
of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated from the Leonine edition by Fr. L. Shapcote, OP and
edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volumes 14 and 16-17;
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (2019). Summa Contra Gentiles [C.G.], in Latin/English Edition of the
Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated from the Marietti edition by Fr. L. Shapcote, OP
and edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volume 12;
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (2026). Commentary on the Sentences Book II [Super Sent., II] [Manuscript
in preparation], in Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated
from the Mandonnet edition by Ch. Decaen, D. Schrader, and B. Mortensen and edited by
The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volumes 3-4;
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (2018). Commentary on the Sentences Book IV, Distinctions 14-25 [Super
Sent., IV], in Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated from
the Moos edition by B. Mortensen, STD and edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus
Academic, Volume 8; https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Tierney, B. (1979). Aristotle, Aquinas, and the Ideal State, Proceedings of the Patristic,
Medieval, and Renaissance Conference (Villanova Univ.), 4.
Tierney, B. (1987) Hierarchy, Consent and the Western Tradition, Political Theory, 15 (4),
-652.
Voegelin, E. (1998). Saint Thomas Aquinas, en History of Political Ideas, vol. II “The
Middle Ages to Aquinas”. In Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, vol. 20 (cap. 12, pp. 207-
. University of Missouri Press.
Weithman, P. (1998). Complementarity and Equality in the Political Thought of Thomas
Aquinas, Theological Studies, 59 (2), 277-296.
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Santiago Argüello
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
