Nicholas Cusanus’ De Deo Abscondito: An Elementary Logical Analysis
Palabras clave:
Cusanus, De Deo Abscondito, proposiciones doblemente negadas, lógica intuicionista, organización teórica alternativaResumen
Cusanus’ brief dialogue De Deo Abscondito presents a dialog between a Pagan and a Christian on
the question of whether God can be known. It is shown that the Pagan argues within classical logic,
whereas the Christian consistently reasons through doubly negated propositions and ad absurdum
arguments—forms of reasoning that belong to what was formalized in the twentieth century as
intuitionist logic. Interpreting the dialogue through this logical distinction yields a more accurate
and coherent understanding of both the content and the structure of the argument. The negative
solution to the central problem is expressed through propositions belonging to a logic later
formalized by Vasiliev in the twentieth century. In the end, both discussants reach an agreement
in which even the Pagan comes to speak of God in the same logical mode as the Christian, namely
through, as usually after Augustine, a mere analogy, which preserves the unknowability of God as
transcending all kinds of specific logic. However, Cusanus’ inventiveness leads him to a new
logical thinking, i.e. to both reason in intuitonist logic and organize according to a new method,
albeit in an incomplete way.
Citas
Aristotle. (1953). Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Clarendon Press.
Berthelot, M. (1890). La revolution chimique-Lavoisier. Alcan.
Cassirer, E. (1963). Individuum und Cosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance.
Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Original work published 1927)
Cusano, N. (1995). Il Dio nascosto (L. Mannarini, Ed.). Laterza.
Cusano, N. (2002). Il Dio nascosto (F. Buzzi, Ed.). BUR.
Cusano, N. (2010). Il Dio nascosto (L. Parinetto, Ed.). Mimesis.
Cusanus, N. (2001a). De docta ignorantia. English translation in Complete Philosophical and
Theological Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, (J. Hopkins transl.). The Arthur J. Banning Press
(pp. 1-56) (Original work published 1440).
Cusanus, N. (2001b). De deo abscondito. English translation in Complete Philosophical and
Theological Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, (J. Hopkins transl.). The Arthur J. Banning Press
(pp. 297-311) (Original work published 1440-45).
Cusanus, N. (2001c). Apologiae doctae ignorantiae. English translation in Complete Philosophical
and Theological Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, (J. Hopkins transl.). The Arthur J. Banning
Press (pp. 457-492) (Original work published 1449).
Cusanus, N. (2001d). De visione Dei. English translation in Complete Philosophical and
Theological Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, (J. Hopkins transl.). The Arthur J. Banning Press
(pp. 351-412). (Original work published 1453).
Cusanus, N. (2001e). De possest. English translation in Complete Philosophical and Theological
Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, (J. Hopkins transl.). The Arthur J. Banning Press (pp. 912-
. (Original work published 1460).
Cusanus, N. (2001f). De non aliud. English translation in Complete Philosophical and Theological
Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, (J. Hopkins transl.). The Arthur J. Banning Press (pp. 1106-
. (Original work published 1462).
Cusanus, N. (2001g). De venatione sapientiae. English translation in Complete Philosophical and
Theological Treatises of Nicholas of Cusa, (J. Hopkins transl.). The Arthur J. Banning Press
(pp. 1275-1381). (Original work published 1463).
De Condillac, E. B. (1780). Logique.
De Cusa, N. (2011). Opuscules (1440–47 et 1459). Institut Catholique de Rennes.
Drago. (2010). Dialectics in Cusanus (1401–1464), Lanza del Vasto (1901–1981) and beyond.
Epistemologia, 33, 305–328.
Drago, A. (2012). Pluralism in logic: The square of opposition, Leibniz’s principle and Markov’s
principle. En J.-Y. Béziau & D. Jacquette (Eds.), Around and beyond the square of opposition
(pp. 175–189). Birkhäuser. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_12
Drago, A. (2017). From Aristotle’s square of opposition to the “tri-unity’s concordance”: Cusanus’
non-classical reasoning. En J.-Y. Béziau, & G. Basti (Eds.), The square of opposition: A
cornerstone of thought (pp. 53–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9_5
Drago, A. (2021). An intuitionist reasoning upon formal intuitionist logic: Logical analysis of
Kolmogorov’s 1932 paper. Logica Universalis, 15(4), pp. 537–552.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-021-00292-3
Drago, A., & Pisano, R. (2004). Interpretation and reconstruction of Sadi Carnot’s Réflexions
through original sentences belonging to non–classical logic. Atti Fond. Ronchi, 59(5), pp.
–644.
Dummett, M. (1977). Elements of intuitionism. Clarendon Press.
Grize, J. B. (1970). Logique. En J. Piaget (Ed.), Logique et connaissance scientifique (pp. 135–
. Gallimard.
Horn, L. R. (1989). The natural history of negation. University of Chicago Press.
Horn, L. R. (2002). The logic of logical double negation. En K. Yasuhiko (Ed.), Proceedings of
the Sophia Symposium on Negation (pp. 79–112). Sophia University Press.
Hughes, G. E., & Cresswell, M. J. (1996). A new introduction to modal logic. Routledge.
Lavoisier, A. L. (1789). Traité élémentaire de chimie. Cuchet. In Les OEuvres de Lavoisier,
l'édition électronique – CNRS.
http://www.lavoisier.cnrs.fr/ice/ice_page_detail.php?lang=fr&type=text&bdd=lavosier&t
able=Lavoisier&bookId=89&typeofbookDes=Ouvrages&pageOrder=16&facsimile=off&
search=no
Miller, C. L. (2003). Introduction: God unknown but adored. En Reading Cusanus. Metaphor and
Dialect in a Conjectural Universe (pp. 1–11). Catholic University of America Press.
Monaco, D. (2014). Il Dio nascosto e la pluralità delle religioni: Il De pace fidei di Nicolò Cusano.
En M. Coppola et al. (Eds.), Dialogos. Il dialogo filosofico fra le religioni (pp. 415–428).
Città Nuova.
Prawitz, D., & Melmnaas, P.-E. (1968). A Survey of Some Connections between Classical,
Intuitionistic and Minimal Logic. En A. Schmidt, K. Schütte, & H. J. Thiele (Eds.),
Contributions to mathematical logic (pp. 215–229). North-Holland.
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Antonio Drago
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
