Thomas Aquinas anthropological-metaphysical and theological understanding of inequality among men
Palabras clave:
Tomás de Aquino, ´Desigualdad social, Trifuncionalidad social, Movilidad socialResumen
The implications that this whole question of equality/inequality among men present in relation to the question of serfdom reveal in a special way the bridge that exists between the metaphysical-anthropological considerations and the social theory of Aquinas himself. The paper argues that, although Thomas considers a series of inequalities among men -both natural and moral-, at the same time, there can be no doubt about his affirmation of a fundamental equality among them. The identical basis of human perfection for all lies in the ontological equality attributable to all members of that species. In this regard, the argument proceeds to a metaphysical analysis of the concepts of aequalitas, similitudo, identitas and unitas, in their relation to humanitas, concluding that among men it must be said that there is a fundamental equality, not likeness. It is established that there are two ways -one positive and the other negative- to show this equality. Regarding the first way, the question of the imago Dei appears as something communis omnibus hominibus. As for the negative manifestation of equality, there is the question of servitude, whose examination in Thomas Aquinas is closely linked to the teaching of two Fathers of the Church, Augustine and Gregory the Great. In conclusion, it is established that for Aquinas there are no people innately superior to others, and that, consequently, to judge that some have de iure certain authority over others, the moral merit of the subjects must be taken into account.
Citas
Aurelius Augustine (1871). The city of God, 2 (books XIV-XXII), transl. by the Rev. M.
Dods. En The works of Aurelius Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, vol. II. T. & T. Clark.
Agustín de Hipona (1958). De civitate Dei, in Obras de San Agustín, t. XVII (ed. bilingüe de
J. Morán). Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.
Argüello, S. (2024). La condición natural y originaria del dominium entre los hombres.
Tomás de Aquino entre Agustín de Hipona y el neorrepublicanismo, Acta
Philosophica, 33 (1), 49-68.
Aristotle (1908). Politics, [transl. by B. Jowett]. Clarendon Press.
Beer, S. (1986). The Rule of the Wise and the Holy: Hierarchy in the Thomistic System,
Political Theory, 14 (3), 391-422.
Blanchette, O. (2003). Philosophy of Being: A Reconstructive Essay in Metaphysics. The
Catholic University of America Press.
Brett, S.F. (1994). Slavery and the Catholic Tradition. Rights in the Balance. Peter Lang.
Corpus iuris civilis (1893), vol 1: Institutiones (ed. P. Krueger); Digesta (ed. T. Mommsen).
Berolini: apud Weidmannos (6ª ed.).
[Corpus Iuris Civilis] (1922). The Institutes of Justinian, with English introd., translation,
and notes by Th.C. Sandars. Longmans, Green and Co. (7th ed.).
Chesterton, G.K. (1910). What’s Wrong With the World. Cassell and Co. (7th ed.).
Deploige, S. (1923). Le conflit de la morale et de la sociologie. 3e édition augmentée d’une
préface de Jacques Maritain et d’un appendice. Nouvelle Librairie Nationale.
Duby, G. (1978). Les trois ordres ou l’imaginaire du féodalisme. Gallimard.
Finnis, J. (1998). Aquinas. Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
S. Gregory the Great (1845). Morals on the Book of Job, vol. II, parts 3-4 (books XI-XXII).
John Henry Parker.
S. Gregory the Great (1847). Morals on the Book of Job, vol. III, part 1 (books XXIII-XXIX).
John Henry Parker
St. Gregory the Great (1950). Pastoral Care, transl. and annotated by H. Davis, SJ. The
Newman Press.
S. Gregorii Magni Opera (1979). Moralia in Iob, libri XI-XXII (ed. M. Adriaen). Brepols.
S. Gregorii Magni Opera (1985). Moralia in Iob, libri XXIII-XXXV (ed. M. Adriaen).
Brepols.
Healy, M.E. (1972). Society and Social Change in the Writings of St. Thomas, Ward, Sumner,
and Cooley. Greenwood Press.
Klubertanz, G. & Land, P. (1951). Practical Reason, Social Fact, and the Vocational Order,
The Modern Schoolman, 28 (4), 239-266.
Luscombe, D.E. (2003). Hierarchy. En A.S. McGrade (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to
Medieval Philosophy (60-72). Cambridge University Press.
Murphy, M. (1997). Consent, Custom and the Common Good in Aquinas’s Account of
Political Authority, Review of Politics, 59 (2), 323-350.
Perpere, Á. (2014). Proyecciones de la ‘ley de la jerarquía’ al pensamiento social. De
Dionisio Areopagita a Santo Tomás de Aquino. En L. Corso, M.J. Soto-Bruna y M.I.
Zorroza (eds.), Ley y razón práctica en el pensamiento medieval y renacentista (pp.
-380). Eunsa.
Reese, E. (2022). Thomas Aquinas and Dionysian Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, Journal of
Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 52 (2) 191-217.
Thomas Aquinas (2012). Summa Theologiae [S. th.], in Latin/English Edition of the Works
of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated by Fr. L. Shapcote, OP and edited by The Aquinas
Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volumes 13-18.
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (1929). Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi
episcopi Parisiensis, t. 2 [Super Sent., II], ed. P. Mandonnet. P. Lethielleux.
Thomas Aquinas. (1969). Sententia libri Ethicorum [Super Ethic.], en Sancti Thomae de
Aquino Opera Omnia, t. 47, vol. II (Libri IV-X–Indices), Iussu Leonis XIII P. M.
edita, cura et studio fratrum praedicatorum. Commissio Leonina.
Thomas Aquinas. (1971). Sententia libri politicorum [Super Pol.], en Sancti Thomae de
Aquino Opera Omnia, t. 48, vol. A, Iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, cura et studio
fratrum praedicatorum. Commissio Leonina.
Thomas Aquinas. (1979). Responsio ad magistrum Ioannem de Vercellis de 108 articulis [Q.
de 108 articulis], en Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia, t. 42 (277-294), Iussu
Leonis XIII P. M. edita, cura et studio fratrum praedicatorum. Editori di San
Tommaso.
Thomas Aquinas. (2007). Commentary on Aristotle’s Politics [Super Pol.], transl. by Richard
J. Reagan. Hackett Publishing Company.
Thomas Aquinas. (2018). Commentary on the Sentences Book IV [Super Sent., IV], in
Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, transl. by B. Mortensen,
STD and edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volumes 7-10;
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (2018). Compendium of Theology [Compendium theologiae], in
Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, transl. by C. Vollert, SJ
and edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volume 55 (Opuscula I -
Treatises); https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (2019). Summa Contra Gentiles [C.G.], in Latin/English Edition of the
Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, transl. by Fr. L. Shapcote, OP and edited by The
Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volumes 11-12.
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas. (2020). Commentary on Metaphysics [In Met.], in Latin/English Edition of
the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, transl. by J.P. Rowan and edited by The Aquinas
Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volumes 50-51.
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas (2023). Disputed Questions On the Power of God [Q. de pot.], in
Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, transl. by Fr. L. Shapcote,
OP and edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volume 25;
https://www.aquinasinstitute.org/aquinas-opera-omnia
Thomas Aquinas (2025). Commentary on the Sentences Book I [Super Sent., I], in
Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, transl. by Ch. Decaen and
edited by The Aquinas Institute & Emmaus Academic, Volumes 1-2;
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Santiago Argüello
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
